Skip to main content

Featured

Attachment Weaponisation: The Bond Was Never an Accident

Attachment Weaponisation: The Bond Was Never an Accident I never noticed the closeness being built. I just assumed it was love, and assumed what I owed because of it, without either of us ever saying it out loud. Short version: Trauma bonding is usually described as something that happens to you, almost by accident, through unpredictable reward. A 2025 Cambridge study, interviewing eighteen women with sustained attachment to abusive partners, found something sharper underneath that: the closeness itself is often deliberately constructed early on, specifically so it can be exploited later. Researchers call this attachment weaponisation. The unsettling part is that it isn't always obvious while it's happening. It can feel completely organic, right up until you realise how much invisible obligation got built into it along the way. What is attachment weaponisation? A 2025 study led by researchers at the University of Cambridge, published in the journal Violence Aga...

You Probably Think They Liked You Less Than They Did

You Probably Think They Liked You Less Than They Did

Last updated: July 2026

There's a name for that post-conversation spiral, and the research says you've been getting the maths wrong the whole time.

Short version: Psychologists call it the liking gap: a well-documented, repeatedly proven pattern where people consistently underestimate how much others actually liked them after a conversation. Tested on strangers, workshop groups, and college roommates over a full year, the finding holds up every time. The person you were sure found you awkward almost certainly didn't. You've just been running bad maths on a completely normal interaction.

What is the liking gap?

The liking gap is a documented psychological pattern in which people consistently underestimate how much another person liked them and enjoyed their company after a conversation, compared to that other person's actual reported opinion. It was named and tested in a 2018 study published in Psychological Science, and it's held up across multiple settings since, including strangers in a lab, adults in workshops, and first-year students living with a new roommate for an entire academic year.

Consistently wrong, in one direction Across every setting tested, people underestimated how much they were liked. The gap doesn't flip the other way. It's a reliable, repeated pattern, not a coin toss.

Why does this happen?

You leave a conversation replaying your own awkward pause, the joke that didn't quite land, the thing you said slightly too loudly. Meanwhile, the other person was doing the exact same thing, about their own awkward pause, not yours. Everyone's too busy auditing their own performance to notice yours wasn't the disaster you've decided it was.

You weren't being judged nearly as hard as you judged yourself. Statistically, nobody usually is.

At what age does this start?

Interestingly, it isn't there from birth. Research found the liking gap develops specifically after around age 5, once children start developing a more self-conscious awareness of how they're being perceived by others. Before that, kids apparently don't waste a single second wondering if the other four-year-old thought they were being weird about the sandpit. That's a skill you pick up later, for free, whether you asked for it or not.

What to actually do with this

  • Stop trusting the post-conversation replay. It's not a neutral account. It's a biased one, and the bias runs in a predictable, wrong direction.
  • Assume you came across better than you think, because statistically, you probably did. Not delusional optimism. Just correcting for a documented error in your own judgement.
  • Let this be one less thing to overthink. If you genuinely don't care either way, brilliant, you've skipped the whole problem. For everyone still doing the 2am replay, this is your permission slip to stop.

Frequently asked questions

What is the liking gap in psychology?+

The liking gap is a documented pattern in which people consistently underestimate how much another person liked them and enjoyed their company after an interaction, compared to that person's actual reported opinion.

Do children experience the liking gap too?+

Research suggests the liking gap develops after around age 5, coinciding with increased self-conscious awareness of how one is perceived by others. Younger children have not been found to show the same pattern.

How reliable is the liking gap finding?+

The liking gap has been demonstrated across multiple studies and settings, including first meetings between strangers, group workshops, and long-term roommate relationships, consistently showing the same underestimation pattern.

Love, Vikki x

Comments