Skip to main content

Featured

A Life Free of Professional Bullshitters

A Life Free of Professional Bullshitters They only bullshit because they're some of the most insecure people on the planet. The research actually backs that up. Short version: The people who bullshit most confidently aren't the most competent, they're often the least self-aware about their own limits, and research links frequent bullshitting directly to narcissistic traits. Confidence and competence are being sold to you as the same thing constantly, and they're not. Once you stop mistaking a good performance for a good answer, the professional bullshitters lose most of their power over you. Why they do it Recent research on bullshit detection found something genuinely telling: people who are least able to spot nonsense tend to overestimate their own competence the most, and separately, frequent bullshitting was more strongly linked to narcissistic and Machiavellian traits than to actual detection skill. In plain terms: the people bullshitting hardest u...

Nice Girl, Bad Idea

Nice Girl, Bad Idea

I'm nice as fuck. Fuck with me, and I turn into Satan. Turns out that's not a personality flaw. It's what actual psychological research says healthy boundaries look like.

Short version: Being warm and kind by default, then switching to fierce and immovable the second someone crosses a real line, isn't volatility. It's proportionate response, and it's genuinely healthier than being nice no matter what. Research from Brené Brown found the most compassionate people studied — therapists, social workers, people whose whole job is care — also had the firmest boundaries. Without boundaries, niceness quietly curdles into resentment wearing a smile. A separate long-term study found women who habitually silenced themselves during conflict were four times more likely to die over ten years than those who spoke up. Being "nice as fuck, until you're not" isn't a flaw to soften. It's the version of kindness that actually holds.

Somewhere along the way, "nice" got confused with "endlessly absorbing." A truly nice person, the story goes, never raises their voice, never says no, never turns into anything sharp, regardless of what's done to them. That's not niceness. That's a person with no working boundary, slowly running out of themselves.

What the research actually says about "nice"

Brené Brown's research found something genuinely counterintuitive: the most compassionate people she studied — monks, therapists, social workers, people whose entire profession is caring for others — also had the firmest boundaries of anyone. Without those boundaries, "niceness" quietly becomes resentment wearing a mask, and it becomes impossible to be genuinely compassionate from a place of resentment. In other words: endlessly nice isn't the more caring option. It's often the less honest one.

4x more likely The Framingham Offspring Study found women who habitually suppressed their feelings during conflict were four times more likely to die over a ten-year period than those who spoke up, even after controlling for other health factors.

That's not a small number. Silencing yourself indefinitely, staying nice through everything regardless of what's actually happening to you, has a measurable physical cost. "Nice as fuck, until you're not" isn't the aggressive version of kindness. It might genuinely be the only sustainable one.

Why the switch flips so hard with a narcissistic parent specifically

She's used to a version of you that absorbs everything quietly. The version with an actual limit isn't a new, worse you. It's the real one, finally allowed to show up.

With someone who's spent years testing and pushing past every soft boundary, a firm one can look shocking by comparison — but that's a reflection of what she's used to, not evidence that your response is disproportionate. Psychologists distinguish clearly between assertiveness and aggression: assertive people are firm without being rude, and they hold their position calmly even if the other person escalates. Turning fierce specifically when a real line gets crossed, and staying warm everywhere else, is that exact profile in practice.

What this actually looks like, day to day

  • Warmth stays the default, because it's genuinely who you are, not a performance you're maintaining under pressure.
  • The switch is proportionate, not random. It shows up specifically when an actual boundary gets crossed, not as generalised hostility.
  • You don't owe anyone a warning shot every time. Consistency matters more than escalation, and people learn a limit is real once it's been held, not just threatened.
  • Being done with the niceness in a specific moment doesn't cancel your kindness overall. Both things are true about you at once, and neither one erases the other.

Frequently asked questions

Is it healthy to be nice most of the time but firm when boundaries are crossed?+

Yes. Research indicates that the most compassionate people often also maintain the firmest boundaries, and that unconditional niceness without limits tends to curdle into resentment rather than reflecting genuine kindness.

What are the health effects of never setting boundaries?+

A long-term study found that habitually suppressing feelings during conflict was associated with a significantly higher mortality risk over a ten-year period, even after accounting for other health factors, suggesting real physical costs to chronic self-silencing.

What's the difference between assertiveness and aggression?+

Assertiveness involves clearly and firmly communicating limits while remaining respectful, whereas aggression involves disregarding the other person's rights or lashing out. Assertive people are firm without being rude, and can hold a boundary calmly even under pressure.

Love, Vikki x

Comments